Property and Democracy
Today, democracy is increasingly under pressure. But how are crisess and attacks on democratic institutions connected to the distribution of property and wealth? And what lessons can be drawn from history? Our research on the “structural transformation of property” can provide important insights into these questions and shed light on how ownership structures shape political participation, social power relations, and the scope for democratic action.
The present dossier demonstrates that ownership and democracy cannot be considered separately from one another. When, for example, public and civil-society actors are weakened through privatization and austerity policies, the conditions for democratic self-determination also change. Ownership structures in the media sector are likewise a central component of democratic societies: they create a public sphere, enable political opinion-forming, and contribute to the oversight of social and political power. This makes the question of who owns the media all the more relevant, as does the question of what interests are associated with ownership and how processes of concentration affect the diversity and independence of public debate.
Finally, social inequalities within democracies must also be taken into account. For although democratic systems are formally based on the political equality of all citizens, the opportunities to exert political influence are by no means equally distributed. Those who have less property, wealth, and resources are often also less represented and less able to assert their interests in political and social decision-making processes. Historically, too, not all people in democracies have always enjoyed equal democratic rights—as the example of enslaved people in the United States illustrates particularly starkly.
Democracy and ownership must therefore be considered together. From this perspective, the question can be asked: How must ownership structures be designed so that democracy is strengthened and not merely exists in formal terms, but also enables social participation, political equality, and collective opportunities to shape society?
Read more
If you are interested in further information, you can also use the searchable text database/bibliography of the New Library of Property; we recommend, for example:
- van Dyk, Silke; Kip, Markus (2023): Die Zukunft sozialer Rechte: Sozialeigentum als Vergesellschaftung von Sozialpolitik. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. https://sfb294-eigentum.de/de/bibliothek/datenbank/8LWJXY3Y/$
- Bandelin, Sebastian; Schosser, Yann (2026): Kants Kritik des Eigentums. Aktualität und Perspektiven im Anschluss an den ethischen Sozialismus. Weinheim: Campus Verlag. https://sfb294-eigentum.de/de/bibliothek/datenbank/QUZ8IND8/$
- Seeliger, Martin; Sevignani, Sebastian (2022): A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere? An Introduction. Theory, Culture & Society. https://sfb294-eigentum.de/de/bibliothek/datenbank/FGV22DLZ/$
- Pfeiffer, Maria (2022): Power, Property, and Participation: Rethinking the Role of Municipalities in German Wind Energy Development. Energy Policy. https://sfb294-eigentum.de/de/bibliothek/datenbank/UJLUZCSZ/$